I entered this class unsure of
what to expect. With a title like
“Foundations of Curriculum and Assessment”, I wasn’t entirely sure what this
course was going to be about. I was
pleasantly surprised however. To my
delight many familiar faces showed up not too long after I did and as the
lecture began, our topic of study became much clearer. Both the text and in lecture, the shift
between traditional and constructivist approaches to curriculum, was discussed. This was a familiar tune, but the conclusion
that we, as future teachers, could take the best of both worlds to form a
better learning environment in the 21st century was a nice outlook
begin the course with.
Previous education courses have
also stressed the need for educators to reach out to students and tap into what
motivates them to learn. Making use of
social media is a good place to start.
The text discusses the use of technology “as tools to engage students
and enhance learning” (p. 24). When I
was in elementary and high school, much to my chagrin, the technology was
always decades behind. Using it to its
full potential to have students become involved and invested in their learning
is exciting – it is ridiculously cool that students from Toronto could have a
Skype conversation with students in Africa!
I would have loved to participate in something like this when I was
younger. Fifty years ago, a live two-way
conversation between two classes on opposite parts of the world with audio and
visual capabilities would be very far-fetched.
The idea of technology
revolutionizing the classroom (and its extensive use in this course) is both
exciting and a little frightening. I am
technologically literate in many respects, but at the same time somewhat
unfamiliar with most of the social media that was brought up in class, such as
Twitter. Despite the vast opportunities
enabled by the use of modern technology, the text also discusses how some
teachers resist to adapting new technologies.
They argue that it makes for an uncomfortable situation when their
students have a better grasp of the technology than they do. Fair enough, but this provides the educator
with a great opportunity to get the students involved in their learning. Helping the teacher will make students feel
useful and engaged and ultimately foster a better learning environment.
You might be wondering about the
Calvin and Hobbes comic. I included it
because it was the first thing that went through my mind when I heard that we
were writing blogs. I don’t like to
share much about myself (as blogs often do).
I am often opposed to change when I am comfortable with what I have and
know. In some ways, there is a
temptation to be like the stagnant teachers mentioned above. I am happy that this course will challenge
that attitude because I know that I will adapt to meet the students in a place
where they are engaged – even if I’ve never posted a Tweet before. Watterson’s clever punch line is that
“Everybody wants the same old thing.” I’m glad that this course doesn’t and
enthusiastic at the prospect of challenging my future students with an approach
that is fresh, relevant, and engaging.
I enjoyed the sentiments expressed in this blog and your willingness to explore further. (Try following me on Twitter at @susanmdrake). It is important to recognize that the students may be far ahead of you and that yes you may need to ask their help. But this has brought up a whole new attitude for teachers who can finally say "I don't know. Can you help me?" Or let's find this out together". It changes the power differential which can change the world....
ReplyDelete